Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society

Table. 3.

Table. 3.

Comparision of the Location and the Number of Stenosis Lesion between Patients with and without Secondary Revasculation

Variable Patients without secondary revasculation (n=26) Patients with secondary revasculation (n=10) p-value
Location of stenosis lesion
CIA 8 (30.8) 1 (10.0) 0.392
EIA 6 (23.1) 1 (10.0) 0.645
CFA 3 (11.5) 1 (10.0) >0.999
SFA 21 (80.8) 10 (100) 0.293
PA 18 (69.2) 7 (70.0) >0.999
ATA 11 (42.3) 3 (30.0) 0.706
PTA 15 (57.7) 5 (50.0) 0.723
Peroneal artery 7 (26.9) 2 (20.0) >0.999
Number of stenosis lesion
1 4 (15.4) 1 (10.0) >0.999
≥2 22 (84.6) 9 (90.0)

The relations between the prevalences of stenosis in different arterial segments and secondary revascularization were assessed. The prevalence of stenosis ≥50% was evaluated in eight different arterial segments in lesion on legs.

Number of stenosis lesion “1” represents the stenosis of a single artery segment, while “≥2” represents the stenosis of 2 or more artery segments.

CIA: common iliac artery, EIA: external iliac artery, CFA: common femoral artery, SFA: superficial femoral artery, PA: popliteal artery, ATA: anterior tibial artery, PTA: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

J Korean Foot Ankle Soc 2024;28:96-101 https://doi.org/10.14193/jkfas.2024.28.3.96
© 2024 J Korean Foot Ankle Soc