
Studies with Arthroscopically Assistant Open Reduction and Internal Fixation
Author (year) | Study design | Sander's type | Patients (n) | Mean follow-up (mo) | Using approach | Arthroscopic device selection | Chages in Böhler angle (°) | Postoperative AOFAS score | Number of secondary STJ fusion | Complications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gavlik et al., 200217,37) | Retrospective comparative study/case series | II, III, IV | 47 | NR | ELA | 1.9 mm, 0° or 4.7 mm, 30° | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Rammelt et al., 200216) | Retrospective comparative study | II, III, IV | 59 | NR | ELA | 1.9 mm, 0° or 4.0 mm, 30° | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Schuberth et al., 200939) | Retrospective case series | I, II, III | 24 | 56.1 | STA | 4.0 mm, 70° | 10.5 | NR | NR | NR |
Park et al., 201838) | Retrospective case series | II | 23 | 15.9 | STA | 2.4 mm, 30° | 14.7 | 91.7 | 0 | 2 (HR), 3 (TNI) |
AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, ELA: extensile lateral approach, STA: sinus tarsi approach, HR: hardware removal, NR: not recorded, STJ: subtalar joint, TNI: transient nerve injury.